BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sabre//Sabre VObject 4.5.8//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Zurich
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Zurich
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/Zurich
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19810329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19961027T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:news779@osteuropa.philhist.unibas.ch
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260305T134608
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260319T181500
SUMMARY:Conspiratorial Memory: Russian Foreign Policy and a Conspiracy-Base
 d Turn in Memory Politics
DESCRIPTION:This lecture introduces “conspiratorial memory” as an emerg
 ent paradigm of memory politics in contemporary international relations. I
 t begins from the observation that claims of genocide\, historical victimh
 ood\, and moral injury – once central to liberal and left-leaning framew
 orks of cosmopolitan memory (Levy and Sznaider 2002) – are increasingly 
 weaponized by authoritative actors in geopolitical conflict. A striking ex
 ample is the Russian state’s campaign to secure recognition of a Nazi 
 “genocide of the Soviet people\,” a project that folds World War II re
 membrance into contemporary foreign policy and frames present conflicts th
 rough conspiratorial narratives of historical injustice and concealment.\\
 r\\nCalling this emerging configuration “conspiratorial memory\,” the 
 lecture examines how it relies on a conspiracybased hermeneutics that fore
 grounds hidden intent\, hostile encroachment\, and deliberate concealment.
  In this process\, cosmopolitan registers of remembrance – legal languag
 e\, genocide discourse\, and transnational commemorative practices – bec
 ome tools for authoritative politics. By oscillating between claims of (hi
 therto unacknowledged) victimhood and self-proclaimed heroic agency\, cons
 piratorial logic enables actors to present themselves simultaneously as hi
 storically injured subjects and as authoritative custodians of moral and g
 eopolitical order.\\r\\nThese rhetorical moves do more than instrumentaliz
 e a selective reading of the past: they reorganize historical time\, frami
 ng contemporary conflict as an unfinished historical struggle in which (So
 viet-)Russia appears both as triumphant hero and as tragic victim. The lec
 ture concludes by reflecting on how such authoritative memory practices ma
 y reshape academic and policy debates about trauma\, justice\, and histori
 cal responsibility.\\r\\nDr. Boris Noordenbos is Associate Professor of Li
 terary & Cultural Analysis at the University of Amsterdam and affiliated w
 ith the Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis. After publishing the monog
 raph Post-Soviet Literature and the Search for a Russian Identity (2016)\,
  he now is the principal investigator of the ECR-funded research project C
 ONSPIRATORIAL MEMORY: Cultures of Suspicion in Post-Socialist Europe (2021
 -2026)\, which focuses on a on a selection of recent conspiracy-based cult
 ural imaginations from Poland\, Russia\, Ukraine and Belarus. His most rec
 ent article\, “The counter-hegemonic hegemon: A cross-platform analysis 
 of a Kremlin-backed strategic narrative” (co-written with Marc Tuters) a
 ppeared in Platforms & Society earlier this year. \\r\\n\\r\\nThe event w
 ill be attended by the Slavic Studies Colloquium group.
X-ALT-DESC:<p>This lecture introduces “conspiratorial memory” as an eme
 rgent paradigm of memory politics in contemporary international relations.
  It begins from the observation that claims of genocide\, historical victi
 mhood\, and moral injury – once central to liberal and left-leaning fram
 eworks of cosmopolitan memory (Levy and Sznaider 2002) – are increasingl
 y weaponized by authoritative actors in geopolitical conflict. A striking 
 example is the Russian state’s campaign to secure recognition of a Nazi 
 “genocide of the Soviet people\,” a project that folds World War II re
 membrance into contemporary foreign policy and frames present conflicts th
 rough conspiratorial narratives of historical injustice and concealment.</
 p>\n<p>Calling this emerging configuration “conspiratorial memory\,” t
 he lecture examines how it relies on a conspiracybased hermeneutics that f
 oregrounds hidden intent\, hostile encroachment\, and deliberate concealme
 nt. In this process\, cosmopolitan registers of remembrance – legal lang
 uage\, genocide discourse\, and transnational commemorative practices – 
 become tools for authoritative politics. By oscillating between claims of 
 (hitherto unacknowledged) victimhood and self-proclaimed heroic agency\, c
 onspiratorial logic enables actors to present themselves simultaneously as
  historically injured subjects and as authoritative custodians of moral an
 d geopolitical order.</p>\n<p>These rhetorical moves do more than instrume
 ntalize a selective reading of the past: they reorganize historical time\,
  framing contemporary conflict as an unfinished historical struggle in whi
 ch (Soviet-)Russia appears both as triumphant hero and as tragic victim. T
 he lecture concludes by reflecting on how such authoritative memory practi
 ces may reshape academic and policy debates about trauma\, justice\, and h
 istorical responsibility.</p>\n<p><strong>Dr. Boris Noordenbos</strong> is
  Associate Professor of Literary &amp\; Cultural Analysis at the Universit
 y of Amsterdam and affiliated with the Amsterdam School for Cultural Analy
 sis. After publishing the monograph Post-Soviet Literature and the Search 
 for a Russian Identity (2016)\, he now is the principal investigator of th
 e ECR-funded research project CONSPIRATORIAL MEMORY: Cultures of Suspicion
  in Post-Socialist Europe (2021-2026)\, which focuses on a on a selection 
 of recent conspiracy-based cultural imaginations from Poland\, Russia\, Uk
 raine and Belarus. His most recent article\, “The counter-hegemonic hege
 mon: A cross-platform analysis of a Kremlin-backed strategic narrative” 
 (co-written with Marc Tuters) appeared in Platforms &amp\; Society earlier
  this year.<br />&nbsp\;</p>\n\n<p>The event will be attended by the Slavi
 c Studies Colloquium group.</p>
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260319T200000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
